The Synchronization of Business Cycles among Iran’s Trade Partners

10.22099/ijes.2013.2032

Abstract

In recent years, investigating synchronization of business cycles among countries, after increasing integration of global economies, has been attracted more attention of policy makers and researchers. Perhaps an unknown origin of such similarities, as an open question, is the main reason of these interests. So, with regard to the mentioned question, the aim of this paper is to investigate some probably determinants of synchronization among Iran’s main trade partners. Therefore, in the first step, in order to measure business cycles, some parametric and non-parametric techniques are used. Then, applying several criteria, the degree of synchronization is determined. After these two steps, employing IV-GLS and QR estimators, the relationship between business cycles and trade intensity index, as a possible channel of synchronization, has considered. The result shows that an increase in trade intensity index increases   business cycle synchronization for all 21 sample countries. Also, this result remained almost unchanged when we divided sample into some subsamples. It is worthy to note that due to the endogeneity of independent variable, the gravity equation and Helpman theorem(1981) are employed. In these equations, some variables such as GDP, common borders and distance had significant effects on trade intensity and hence on business cycles

Keywords

Article Title [Persian]

همزمانی ادوار تجاری بین شرکای تجاری ایران

Abstract [Persian]

در سال‌های اخیر، بررسی همزمانی ادوار تجاری بین کشورها، بعد از ادغام فزایندة اقتصادهای جهانی، بیش از پیش توجه محققان و سیاست‌گذاران را به خود جلب کرده است. شاید منشأ نه‌چندان شناخته شدة این همزمانی‌ها، به‌عنوان یک سؤال باز، دلیل اصلی این میزان اقبال بوده است. بنابراین، با توجه به سؤال مزبور، هدف این مقاله بررسی تعیین کننده‌های احتمالی همزمانی ادوار تجاری بین ایران و شرکای تجاری آن می‌باشد. از اینرو، در گام اول، از تکنیک‌های مختلف پارامتریک و ناپارامتریک جهت اندازه‌گیری ادوار تجاری استفاده شده است. سپس، با بکارگیری ملاک‌های مختلف میزان همزمانی ادوار تعیین گردیده و آنگاه با استفاده از برآوردگرهای IV-GLS و QR ارتباط بین شاخص شدت تجارت و شاخص همزمانی ادوار، بررسی شده است.
نتایج ما نشان می‌دهد که برای 21 کشورحاضر در نمونه، شاخص افزایش تجارت باعث افزایش همزمانی بین ادوار تجاری می‌شود. همچنین زمانی‌که ما نمونه اصلی را به زیرنمونه‌های مشخص تقسیم کردیم این نتیجه همچنان بدون تغییر باقی ماند. شایان ذکر است که جهت در نظر گرفتن درون‌زایی خود متغیر مستقل( شدت تجارت) در این بررسی، از معادلة جاذبه و نظریه هلپمن (1981) نیز کمک گرفته شد. تولید ناخالص داخلی کشورها، مرزهای مشترک و فاصلة پایتخت کشورها از همدیگر از مهم‌ترین متغیرهایی بودند که در معادلة جاذبه اثر معنی‌دار بر شاخص شدت تجارت و آنگاه همزمانی ادوار داشتند

Keywords [Persian]

  • ادوار تجاری
  • همزمانی ادوار تجاری
  • معادلة جاذبه
  • شاخص شدت تجارت
  • شرکای تجاری

References

Baum f. C. (2006). Time-series Filtering Techniques in STATA, Department of         Economics, Boston College.

Baxter, M., King, R.G., (1999). Measuring Business Cycles: Approximate Band-Pass Filters for Economic Time Series. The Review of Economics and Statistics 81(4), 575-593.

Burns, A.F & Mitchell, W.C. (1946). Measuring Business Cycles, NY.NBER.

Calderón, C., & Chong, A., & Stein, E. 2002. Trade Intensity   and Business Cycles Synchronization: Are Developing Countries any Different, Central Bank of Chile, WP195.

Canova.F. (1998). Detrending and Business Cycle Facts, Journal of Monetary Economics , 41(3), 475-512.

Chong-ll, C. (2001). An Impact of Economic Integration through Trade: On Business Cycles for 10 East Asian Countries, Journal of Asian Economics, 12( 4),569-86.

Cogley.T & Nason.M (1995).  Effects of the Hodrick-Prescott filter on Trend and difference Stationary Series: Implications for Business Cycles Research, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19(1-2), 253-278.

Cotis ,J-P., & Coppel, J.(2005). Business Cycle Dynamics in OECD  Countries: Evidence, Causes, and Policy Implications, OECD, Economics Department, Sydney, Australia.

Frankel, J.A. (2004). Real convergence and euro adoption in Central and Eastern Europe: Trade and Business Cycle Correlations as Endogenous Criteria for Joining EMU, John F. Kennedy School of Government Working Paper, No. RWP04-039.

Frankel, J.A. & Rose, A.K. (1998). The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria, Economic Journal, 108(449), 1009-1025.

Frankel, J.A., Rose, A.K.( 1997). Is EMU Justifiable ex post than ex ante?, European Economic Review 41(3-5), 753-760.

Garcia-Herrero A., & M.Ruiz, J. (2008). Do Trade and Financial Linkages foster  Business Cycle Synchronization in a Small Economy,WP 0801,Bank of Spain.

Garnier, J. (2003). Has the Similarity of Business Cycles in Europe Increased with the Monetary Integration Process? , EUI Working paper ECO No. 2003/12

Green, W.H.(2002).”Econometrics Analysis”, Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall, NY University.

Harding, D. and Pagan, A. (2002). Dissecting the cycle: a Methodological Investigation, Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(2), 365-381.

Helbling,T. and Bayoumi, T. (2003).  Are They All in the Same Boat? The 2000-2001 Growth Slowdown and the G-7 Business Cycle Linkages, IMF Working Papers 03/46.

Helpman, E.(1981). International Trade in the Presence of Product Differentiation, Economies of Scale, and Monopolistic Competition: a Chamberlin-Heckscher-Ohlin Approach. Journal of International Economics, 11(3),305-340.

Hodrick, R., and Prescott, E.C. (1997). Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation,  Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29 (1), 1–16.

Rana, P. B. (2007). Trade Intensity and Business Cycle Synchronization The Case of East Asia, Asian Development Bank, WP, no10.

Romberg, R.R.(1968).Transmission of Business Fluctuations from Developed to Developing Countries, IMF Staff Papers, Vol15(1).

Stein , E. & Weinhold, D. (1998). Canadian – US Border Effects and the Gravity Equation Model of Trade, Washington, DC: Inter – American Development  Bank. Mimeo.

Iranian Journal of Economic Studies

Volume 2, Issue 1
Winter and Spring 2013
Pages 49-71

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 September 2012
  • Revise Date: 15 June 2013
  • Accept Date: 21 August 2013

Share

How to cite

Statistics