RETRACTED:The Role of Foreign Direct Investment, Technology Transfer and Spillover Effects on Economic Growth: A GTAP model

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Department of Environmental Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of technology transfer through the imports of intermediate goods by developing countries developed countries with the emphasis on Iran economy. For this purpose, we used multi-sectoral and multi–regional computable general equilibrium GTAP model (multi-sectoral and multi-regional CGE model). The paper examined the effect of a ten percent productivity shock in high-tech industries of industrial countries on economic sectors of Iran. The result shows that technology transfer embodied in Iran’s imports of intermediate goods leads to increase in outputs and decrease in prices. Factors such as absorptive capacity, structural similarity and effectiveness contributed to the spillover effects of technological improvements in Iran.

Keywords


Aitken, B.J., & Harrison, A.E. (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89, 605–618.

Alfaroa, L., Chandab, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and Economic Growth: the Role of Local Financial Markets. Journal of International Economics, 64, 89-112.

Blomstrom, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational Corporations and Spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 247–277.

Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (2003). Human capital and inward FDI, European Commission under the Training and Mobility of Researchers Programmed.

Coe, David T., & Helpman, E. (1993). International R&D Spillovers. CEPR Discussion Papers, No, 840.

Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.

Das, G., & Powell, A.L. (2000). Absorption Capacity, Structural Similarity and Embodied Technology Spillovers in a ‘Macro’ Model: An Implementation within a Computable General Equilibrium Framework. Korean J. Policy Studies, 16, 111-132.

Das, G. (2011). How does Trade-Mediated Technology Transfer Affect Interregional and Intersectional Competition? Exploring Multi-Sectoral Effects in a Global Trade Model. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 5871-5886.

Dunning, J.H. (1973). The Determinants of International Production. Oxford Economic Papers, 25, 289–336.

Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, Knowledge Spillovers, and Growth. European Economic Review, 35, 517-26.

Lucas, R.E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.

Meyer, K. (2003). FDI Spillovers in Emerging Markets: A Literature Review and New Perspectives. Copenhagen Business School, Working Paper, No. 15.

Narjoko, D. (2009). Foreign Presence Spillovers and Firms’ Export Response: Evidence from the Indonesian Manufacturing. ERIA Discussion Paper Series, No. 23.

Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.

Solow, R.M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.

Shimizu, M. (1997). Value Added Productivity Measurement and its Practical Applications. Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development.

Van Meijl, H. (1995). Endogenous Technological Change: The Case of Information Technology: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results. Universities Press Maastricht.

Van Meijl, H., & Van Tongeren, F. (1998). Trade, Technology Spillovers, and Food Production in China. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch. Band, 134, 443-449.

Westphalia, L.E. (1982). Fostering Technological Masteryby Means of Selective Infant Industry Protection, In Syrequin, & S. Title (Eds.), Trade, Stability, Technology, and Equity in Latin America, New York, NY: Academic Press.