Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Economics, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran.

2 Department of Economics, university of Sargodha, Pakistan

3 school of international Trade and economics, university of international business and economics, Beijing, china.

10.22099/ijes.2022.42192.1795

Abstract

The present paper aims to test the new structural economics hypothesis in regard to the effect of development strategy on economic growth in a country that has witnessed an eight-year war and has suffered severe sanctions i.e., Iran. According to the new structural economics, if a country adopts a comparative advantage defying strategy, it will have poor growth performance. In contrast, to have a strong economic growth, it should employ a comparative advantage following strategy. the technology choice index (TCI) is utilized as a proxy of development strategy. Based on this indicator, increasing of TCI means that a country is conducting a comparative advantage defying strategy. The relationship is estimated by the ARDL bounds test approach. To run the model, the technology choice index (TCI), and a variety of control variables were included in the model. Hence, time-series data was collected from reliable databases for the period 1979-2018. The results in which their stability is checked, reveal a negative effect of adopting a comparative advantage defying strategy on economic growth, which supports Lin's hypothesis. In other words, it is shown that by increasing TCI, economic growth is declined significantly. So, to achieve economic growth, a kind of development strategy should be adopted that is based on pursuing comparative advantages.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

اثر استراتژی توسعه بر رشد اقتصادی ایران: رویکرد اقتصاد ساختارگرایی جدید

Authors [Persian]

  • سید روح اله احمدی حاجی آبادی 1
  • جبار الحق 2
  • هوبرت ویساس 3

1 گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه دامغان، دامغان، ایران.

2 گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه سارگودا، پاکستان

3 دانشکده تجارت و اقتصاد بین الملل، دانشگاه تجارت بین الملل و اقتصاد، پکن، چین.

Abstract [Persian]

مقاله حاضر با هدف آزمون فرضیه اقتصاد ساختارگرای جدید با توجه به تأثیر استراتژی توسعه بر رشد اقتصادی در کشوری که شاهد جنگ هشت ساله بوده و تحریم های شدیدی را متحمل شده، یعنی ایران می باشد. بر اساس دیدگاه اقتصاد ساختارگرای جدید، اگر یک کشور استراتژی مخالف مزیت نسبی را اتخاذ کند، عملکرد رشد ضعیفی خواهد داشت. در مقابل، برای داشتن یک رشد اقتصادی قوی، باید از استراتژی پیروی از مزیت نسبی تبعیت کند. شاخص انتخاب فناوری (TCI) به عنوان نماینده استراتژی توسعه استفاده می شود. بر اساس این شاخص، افزایش TCI به این معنی است که یک کشور در حال اجرای استراتژی نادیده گرفتن مزیت نسبی است. این رابطه با رویکرد آزمون کرانه های ARDL برآورد شده است. برای اجرای مدل، شاخص انتخاب فناوری (TCI) و انواع متغیرهای کنترلی در مدل گنجانده شد. از این رو، داده های سری زمانی از پایگاه های داده قابل اعتماد برای دوره 1979-2018 جمع آوری شد. نتایجی که ثبات آنها بررسی شده است، تأثیر منفی اتخاذ استراتژی مقابله با مزیت نسبی بر رشد اقتصادی را نشان می‌دهد که از فرضیه لین پشتیبانی می‌کند. به عبارت دیگر، نشان داده می شود که با افزایش TCI، رشد اقتصادی به طور قابل توجهی کاهش می یابد. بنابراین برای دستیابی به رشد اقتصادی باید نوعی استراتژی توسعه اتخاذ شود که مبتنی بر پیروی از مزیت نسبی باشد.

Keywords [Persian]

  • اقتصاد ساختاری جدید
  • مزیت نسبی
  • استراتژی توسعه
  • ARDL
  • ایران
Ang, J. B. (2008). Financial development and economic growth in Malaysia. Routledge.
Barmaki, A. (2015). Pathology of development programs after the Islamic revolution. Plan and Budget Organization of Iran.
Bruno, R. L., Douarin, E., Korosteleva J., & Radosevic, S. (2015). Technology choices and growth: Testing new structural economics in transition economies. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(2), 131-152.
Chen, J., & Xie, L. (2019). Industrial policy, structural transformation and economic growth: Evidence from China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 13(1), 1-19.
Collier, P. (2018). The future of capitalism: Facing the new anxieties. New York: Harper.
Dehghan Khavari, S., Mirjalili, S., & Momeni, F. (2017, a). Industrial development strategy from perspective of new structural theory (based on experience of leading developing countries). Majlis and Rahbord, 24(91), 101-139.
Dehghan Khavari, S., Mirjalili, S., & Momeni, F. (2017, b). Application of the new structural economics to Iranian eoconmic development within the framework of growth identification and facilitation framework (GIFF) for determination of the leading sectors. The Journal of Economic Policy, 9(17), 233-268.
Easterly, W. (2002). The elusive quest for growth: Economists' adventures and misadventures in the tropics. MIT Press.
Gertz, G., & Kharas, H. (2019). Beyond neoliberalism: Insights from emerging markets.
Gnangnon, S. K. (2020). Comparative advantage following (CAF) development strategy, aid for trade flows and structural change in production. Journal of Economic Structures, 9(1), 1.
Laudati, D., & Pesaran, M. H. (2021). Identifying the effects of sanctions on the Iranian economy using newspaper coverage. CESifo Working Paper No. 9217.
Lin, J. Y. (2017). Industrial policies for avoiding the middle-income trap: A new structural economics perspective. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 15(1), 5-18.
Lin, J., & Chang, H. J. (2009). Should industrial policy in developing countries conform to comparative advantage or defy it? A debate between Justin Lin and Ha‐Joon Chang. Development Policy Review, 27(5), 483-502.
Lin, J. Y. (2011). From flying geese to leading dragons: New opportunities and strategies for structural transformation in developing countries. The World Bank.
Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development and policy. The World Bank.
Lin, J. Y. (2015). The Washington consensus revisited: A new structural economics perspective. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(2), 96-113.
Lin, J. Y., & Liu, M. (2004). Development strategy, transition and challenges of development in lagging regions. ABCDE: 197.
Lin, J. Y., & Monga, C. (2013). Comparative advantage: The silver bullet of industrial policy. The Industrial Policy Revolution I, Springer, 19-38.
Lin, J. Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). Seventy years of economic development: A review from the angle of new structural economics. China & World Economy, 28(4), 26-50.
Lin, J., & Wang, X. (2017). The facilitating state and economic development: The role of the state in new structural economics. Man and the Economy, 4(2), 20170013.
Loayza, N., Easterly, W., & Montiel, P. (1999). Has Latin America's post-reform growth been disappointing? The World Bank.
Olanrewaju, G. O., Aremo, A. G., & Binuyo, B. O. (2020). Inclusive growth effects of institutional quality in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 16(1).
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
Rajabpour, H. (2019). Pathology of lack of industrial development strategy in Iran. Islamic Parliament Research Center of The Islamic Republic of Iran.
Siddique, A. B. (2014). Comparative advantage defying development strategy and cross-country poverty incidence. KDI School.