Analyzing the Effects of Interest Rate Shocks in Iran's Economy Considering Shadow Banking Using Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium Model

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Economics, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran

Abstract

In recent years, with the expansion of financial institutions such as investment funds, non-bank financial and credit institutions, and financing funds, a sector has been formed in Iran's economy that performs its duties in parallel with the standard banking sector, which is known as shadow banking. The formation of such a structure in the economy can be considered a part of the monetary transfer mechanism and affect macroeconomic variables. This study shows that shadow banking is growing rapidly in Iran and due to lack of activity within the framework of Central Bank regulations, it can reduce the effectiveness of monetary policies. In this study, in order to model the shadow banking sector, a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model has been used considering different sectors of the economy during the period of 2010-2019. The results of the simulation show that the effect of the shadow banking sector on macroeconomic variables is similar to the effect of the standard banking sector, which indicates its impact on the Iranian economy. Also, the simulation of shocks related to interest rates shows that interest rate developments in the shadow banking sector have the same function as the conventional monetary transfer mechanism in the standard banking sector. Therefore, developments in this sector can significantly affect the future direction of economic variables

Keywords

Main Subjects


Article Title [Persian]

تحلیل اثرات شوک نرخ بهره در اقتصاد ایران با در نظر گرفتن بانکداری سایه با استفاده از مدل تعادل عمومی پویا تصادفی

Authors [Persian]

  • اشکان مکی پور 1
  • احمد صلاح منش 1
  • ابراهیم انواری 1
  • لیلا رشنوادی 2
1 گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
2 دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران. ایران
Abstract [Persian]

در سال‌های اخیر با گسترش نهادهای مالی مانند صندوق‌های سرمایه‌گذاری، مؤسسات مالی و اعتباری غیربانکی و صندوق‌های تأمین مالی، بخشی در اقتصاد ایران شکل گرفته است که به موازات بخش بانکداری استاندارد، وظایف خود را انجام می‌دهد. به عنوان بانکداری سایه شکل‌گیری چنین ساختاری در اقتصاد را می‌توان بخشی از سازوکار انتقال پولی دانست و بر متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی اثرگذار بود. این مطالعه نشان می دهد که بانکداری سایه در ایران به سرعت در حال رشد است و به دلیل عدم فعالیت در چارچوب مقررات بانک مرکزی می تواند اثربخشی سیاست های پولی را کاهش دهد. در این تحقیق به منظور مدل سازی بخش بانکداری سایه، از مدل تعادل عمومی تصادفی پویا (DSGE) با در نظر گرفتن بخش های مختلف اقتصاد طی دوره زمانی 2010-2019 استفاده شده است. نتایج شبیه‌سازی نشان می‌دهد که تأثیر بخش بانکداری سایه بر متغیرهای کلان اقتصادی مشابه تأثیر بخش بانکداری استاندارد است که نشان‌دهنده تأثیر آن بر اقتصاد ایران است. همچنین، شبیه‌سازی شوک‌های مربوط به نرخ‌های بهره نشان می‌دهد که تحولات نرخ بهره در بخش بانکداری سایه عملکردی مشابه مکانیسم انتقال پولی مرسوم در بخش بانکداری استاندارد دارد. بنابراین، تحولات این بخش می تواند به طور قابل توجهی بر جهت گیری متغیرهای اقتصادی در آینده تأثیر بگذارد.

Keywords [Persian]

  • بانکداری سایه
  • مکانیسم انتقال پول
  • مدل تعادل عمومی پویا تصادفی
  • نرخ بهره
Azimi, A. and Gilak Hakimabadi, H. (2019). Investigating the impact of the
shadow banking system in Iran's economy. Master's Thesis of Economic
Sciences, Mazandaran University (In Persian).
Bernanke, B. S., M. Gertler, and S. Gilchrist: 1999, 'The financial accelerator in
a quantitative business cycle framework'. In: J. B. Taylor and M. Woodford
(eds.): Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 1. Elsevier, Chapt. 21, pp.
1341_1393.
Chen, Z., He, Z., & Liu, C. (2018a). The financing of local government in the
People's Republic of China: stimulus loan wanes and shadow banking waxes.
In: ADBI Working Paper No. 800. Asian Development Bank Institute,
Tokyo. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140074
Chen, K., Ren, J., & Zha, T. (2018b). The nexus of monetary policy and shadow
banking in China. American Economic Review, 108 (12), 3891-3936.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.`20170133
Christiano, L. J., R. Motto, and M. Rostagno: 2003, 'The Great Depression and
the Friedman-Schwartz Hypothesis'. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking
35(6 – part 2), 1119_1197.
Christiano, L., Motto, R., & Rostagno, M. (2008). Shocks, structures or monetary
policies? The Euro Area and US after 2001. Journal of Economic Dynamics
and control, 32(8), 2476-2506.
Funke, Michael, Mihaylovskim Petar and Zhu ,Haibin (2015) Monetary policy
trans-mission in China: A DSGE model with parallel shadow banking and
Makipour et al., Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 12(1) 20223, 51-68 67
interest rate control. BOFIT Discussion Papers 9/20159.3.2015 .
ttp://www.bof.fi/bofit.
Gerali, A., Neri, S., Sessa, L., & Signoretti, F. M. (2010). Credit and Banking in
a DSGE Model of the Euro Area. Journal of money, Credit and Banking, 42,
107-141.
Gertler, M., & Sala, L., & Trigari, A. (2007). “An Estimated Monetary DSGE
Model with Unemployment and Staggered Nominal Wage Bargaining”, No
341, Working Papers from IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for
Economic Research), Bocconi University.
https://repec.unibocconi.it/igier/igi/wp/2008/341.pdf (application/pdf)
Gertler M and Kiyotaki N.. Financial Intermediation and Credit Policy in
Business Cycle. Analysis. In B. M. Friedman and M. Woodford, editors,
Handbook of Monetary Economics, volume 3 of Handbook of Monetary
Economics, chapter 11, pages 547(599. Elsevier, January 2010)
Goodfriend, M. and B. T. McCallum: 2007, 'Banking and interest rates in
monetary policy analysis: A quantitative exploration'. Journal of Monetary
Economics 54(5), 1480_1507.
Iacoviello, M.: 2005, 'House Prices, Borrowing Constraints, and Monetary Policy
in the Business Cycle'. American Economic Review 95(3), 739_764.
Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro & Moore, John (1997). "Credit Cycles". Journal of Political
Economy. 105 (2): 211–248. doi:10.1086/262072
Kobayashi, T.: 2008, 'Incomplete Interest Rate Pass-Through and Optimal
Monetary Policy'. International Journal of Central Banking 4(3), 77_118.
Liu Yang , S. van Wijnbergen , Xiaotong Qi , Yuhuan Yi (2019). Chinese
shadow banking, financial regulation and effectiveness of
monetarypolicyPacific-Basin Finance Journal Volume 57, October 2019,
101169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.06.016
Mazelis, F. (2016). Implications of shadow bank regulation for monetary policy
at the zero lower bound. SFB 649 Discussion Papers. No.SFB649DP2016-
043, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Meh, C. A. and K. Moran: 2010, 'The role of bank capital in the propagation of
shocks'. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 34(3), 555_576.
Nelson, B., Gabor, P., & Konstantinos, T. (2018). Do contractionary monetary
policy shocks expand shadow banking? Journal of Applied Econometrics.
33, 198-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jae.2594
Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2003). An estimated dynamic stochastic general
equilibrium model of the Euro area. Journal of the European Economic
Association,1(5),1123-1175.
Smets, R, & Wouters, M. (2007). "Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A
Bayesian DSGE approach, The American Economic Review, vol.97, No.3.
Sun, S., & Gan, C., & Hu, B. (2012). “Evaluating McCallum Rule as a Policy
Guideline for China”, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 17(3).
Van den Heuvel, S. J. (2008). The welfare cost of bank capital
requirements. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55(2), 298-320.
68 Makipour et al., Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 12(1) 20223, 51-68
Walque, G., Pierrard, O., & Rouabah, A. (2010). Financial (in) stability,
supervision and liquidity injections: a dynamic general equilibrium
approach. The Economic Journal, 120(549), 1234-1261.
Woodford, M. (2003) Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary
Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Zarei,M & Esfandiari, M & Mirjalili, H. (2020). Analyzing the effects of shadow
banking in affecting monetary policy: evidence of some G-20 countries,
Money and Banking research, 13, 46